WIEDENHAUPT, KURT A. v. HOGAN, JR., PAUL F.
This text of WIEDENHAUPT, KURT A. v. HOGAN, JR., PAUL F. (WIEDENHAUPT, KURT A. v. HOGAN, JR., PAUL F.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 1167 CA 11-00072 PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.
KURT A. WIEDENHAUPT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAUL F. HOGAN, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)
DUKE, HOLZMAN, PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (JAMES W. GRESENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
JAECKLE FLEISCHMANN & MUGEL, LLP, BUFFALO (HEATH J. SZYMCZAK OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick J. Marshall, J.), entered December 22, 2010. The order, among other things, granted defendant’s motion for leave to reargue, and upon reargument, adhered to the prior order entered August 16, 2010.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same Memorandum as in Wiedenhaupt v Hogan ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 18, 2011]).
Entered: November 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
WIEDENHAUPT, KURT A. v. HOGAN, JR., PAUL F., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiedenhaupt-kurt-a-v-hogan-jr-paul-f-nyappdiv-2011.