Wiedeman v. State

506 So. 2d 1079, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1058, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7704
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 16, 1987·No. No. 86-1602·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s sentence under section 958.-04, Florida Statutes (1985), the Youthful Offender Statute, of four years incarceration followed by ten years probation, with the first two years of the probationary period to be served on community control, is improper because (1) it violates the six year limitation provided in that statute and (2) because it was a downward departure from the recommended guidelines sentence of four and one-half to five and one-half years incarceration and clear and convincing written reasons for such departure were not provided by the trial court as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)(11) for a departure sentence. See State v. Evans, 503 So.2d 985 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).

Appellant’s sentence is vacated and the cause is remanded for the imposition of a guidelines sentence or a proper departure sentence.

SENTENCE VACATED; CAUSE REMANDED.

ORFINGER, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiedeman v. State, 506 So. 2d 1079, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1058, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 7704 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

506 So. 2d 1079 (Wiedeman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kepner
560 So. 2d 251 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Nealy
532 So. 2d 1117 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)