Wiedeman v. Mickel

269 So. 2d 53, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5853
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 1972
DocketNo. 72-358
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 269 So. 2d 53 (Wiedeman v. Mickel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wiedeman v. Mickel, 269 So. 2d 53, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5853 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinions

MANN, Judge.

The judgment of adoption, terminating the right of appellant, the girl’s natural father, cannot be upheld consistently with the law as declared by our Supreme Court. Torres v. Van Eepoel, Fla.1957, 98 So.2d 735; Wiggins v. Rolls, Fla.1958, 100 So.2d 414; In re Whetstone, 1939, 137 Fla. 712, 188 So. 576. See also In re Prangley, Fla.App.2d 1960, 122 So.2d 423; Roy v. Holmes, Fla.App.2d 1959, 111 So.2d 468; Annot., 35 A.L.R.2d 662.

The home of her aunt and uncle, who have kept her since her mother’s death, and in which she wishes to remain, is probably preferable. She does well in school, is active in her church and happy. But the father’s home is concededly suitable. The evidence that he abandoned her after his divorce from her mother is simply inadequate.

Reversed and remanded.

LILES, Acting C. J., and McNULTY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rahn v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
259 N.W.2d 838 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1977)
Mickel v. Wiedeman
272 So. 2d 818 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 So. 2d 53, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 5853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiedeman-v-mickel-fladistctapp-1972.