Wieczorek v. Wieczorek

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wieczorek v. Wieczorek

886 S.W.2d 230, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1747, 1994 WL 614029

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 1994·No. No. 65361·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals that portion of the dissolution decree awarding primary custody of the parties’ three year old son to father. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not [231]*231against the weight of the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order af-finning the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Mother appeals that portion of the dissolution decree awarding primary custody of the parties’ three year old son to father. We affirm. The judgment of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not [231]*231against the weight of the evidence, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order af-finning the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Wieczorek v. Wieczorek, 886 S.W.2d 230, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1747, 1994 WL 614029 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

886 S.W.2d 230 (Wieczorek v. Wieczorek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.