Wiech v. Fairfax County Dept. of Human Development

Fourth Circuit

Wiech v. Fairfax County Dept. of Human Development

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23212, 1995 WL 371031

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 1995

Docket95-1072

StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 168 (Wiech v. Fairfax County Dept. of Human Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wiech v. Fairfax County Dept. of Human Development, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23212, 1995 WL 371031 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert A. WIECH; Helen H. Wiech, acting en loco parentis on
behalf of their children Sarah C. Wiech and
Christopher Wiech and individually on
their own behalf, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; Fairfax
County Public Schools, DEFENDANTS--Appellees.

No. 95-1072.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Robert A. Wiech, Helen H. Wiech, Appellants Pro Se. Dennis Roane Bates, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, VA; Thomas John Cawley, John Francis Cafferky, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Fairfax, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion rendered from the bench, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wiech v. Fairfax County Dep't of Human Dev., No. 94-1492-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 1994); see 20 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1415 (West 1990 & Supp.1995); Susan R.M. v. Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist., 818 F.2d 455 (5th Cir.1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert A. WIECH; Helen H. Wiech, acting en loco parentis on
behalf of their children Sarah C. Wiech and
Christopher Wiech and individually on
their own behalf, Plaintiffs--Appellants,
v.
FAIRFAX COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; Fairfax
County Public Schools, DEFENDANTS--Appellees.

No. 95-1072.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 20, 1995.

Robert A. Wiech, Helen H. Wiech, Appellants Pro Se. Dennis Roane Bates, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, VA; Thomas John Cawley, John Francis Cafferky, HUNTON & WILLIAMS, Fairfax, VA, for Appellees.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of standing. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion rendered from the bench, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wiech v. Fairfax County Dep't of Human Dev., No. 94-1492-A (E.D. Va. Dec. 2, 1994); see 20 U.S.C.A. Sec. 1415 (West 1990 & Supp.1995); Susan R.M. v. Northeast Indep. Sch. Dist., 818 F.2d 455 (5th Cir.1987). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 F.3d 168, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23212, 1995 WL 371031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wiech-v-fairfax-county-dept-of-human-development-ca4-1995.