Widtfeldt v. Commissioner
This text of 565 F. App'x 577 (Widtfeldt v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James Widtfeldt appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of his pro se action, in which he alleged, among other things, that defendants attempted to violate a tax court order by pursuing tax collection against him. He sought damages and injunctive relief. Upon careful review, see Pagonis v. United States, 575 F.3d 809, 812 (8th Cir.2009), we conclude that dismissal was proper: sovereign immunity shields defendants from Widtfeldt’s claim for money damages, see F.D.I.C. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 474, 114 S.Ct. 996, 127 L.Ed.2d 308 (1994), and his attempt to enjoin tax collection is prohibited by the Anti-Injunction Act, see 26 U.S.C. § 7421(a). Accordingly, we affirm.
. The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
565 F. App'x 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widtfeldt-v-commissioner-ca8-2014.