Widrovitz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
This text of 35 Misc. 819 (Widrovitz v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence shows that the plaintiff went deliberately upon the track about fifty feet ahead of a moving car. Some trucks passing along the street prevented his going ahead, but it does not appear that there was anything to prevent his stepping back. This he made no effort to do. It may be that he was justified in going on to the track, but when he found that [820]*820he could not cross he should have made some effort to retrace his steps.
The judgment is right and should be affirmed.
Present: Scott, P. J., Beach and Fitzgerald, JJ.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Misc. 819, 72 N.Y.S. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widrovitz-v-metropolitan-street-railway-co-nyappterm-1901.