Widows' & Orphans' Home & Charitable Institution of the Church of the Living God v. Anderson

224 S.W. 1115, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 968
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 21, 1920
DocketNo. 2317.
StatusPublished

This text of 224 S.W. 1115 (Widows' & Orphans' Home & Charitable Institution of the Church of the Living God v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Widows' & Orphans' Home & Charitable Institution of the Church of the Living God v. Anderson, 224 S.W. 1115, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 968 (Tex. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

WILLSON, C. J.

The suit was by Lige Burkley and C. L. Bryant against appellee, George Anderson. It was to try the title to a tract of land in Cherokee county. In his answer Anderson alleged that he did not then own and had never owned the land, and then alleged that appellant, a corporation, owned it and by contract had bound itself to convey it to him. He asked that appellant be made a party and that he have judgment requiring it to specifically perform its contract to convey to him. Appellant in its pleading denied having contracted to convey1 the land to Anderson, and sought judgment against him for same and for damages for withholding the possession thereof from it. The appeal is by the Widows’ and Orphans’ Home, etc., alone, from a judgment dismissing the suit so far as it was by Burkley against Anderson and awarding said Anderson the relief he sought against said Widows’ and Orphans’ Home, etc. No mention was made in the judgment of the plaintiff C. L. Bryant, and it is conceded in the briefs of the parties to the appeal that the suit, so far as it was by him against Anderson, was not disposed of by the judgment. So, it appears the judgment is not a final one, and that this court therefore is without power to revise it and cannot do otherwise than dismiss the appeal. Cock v. Marshall Gas Co., 224 S. W. 527, decided here January 29, 1920, and the cases there cited to wit, Benge v. Sledge, 132 S. W. 873; Jackson v. Coombs, 65 S. W. 385; Machine Co. v. Lipper, 179 S. W. 701. Therefore it is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Benge v. Sledge
132 S.W. 873 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
J. I. Case Threshing MacH. Co. v. Lipper
179 S.W. 701 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Cock v. Marshall Gas Co.
224 S.W. 527 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
224 S.W. 1115, 1920 Tex. App. LEXIS 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widows-orphans-home-charitable-institution-of-the-church-of-the-texapp-1920.