Widney v. Superior Court
258 P. 416, 84 Cal. App. 498, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 416
Opinion
THE COURT.
In substance, the petitioner herein prays for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to allow a jury trial in a case wherein the right of trial by jury has been denied. [1] On the stated facts, set forth in the petition, mandate is not the appropriate remedy. (Donohue v. Superior Court,
Wherefore it is ordered by the court that the petition for writ of mandate be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Widney v. Superior Court, 258 P. 416, 84 Cal. App. 498, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 416 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927).
258 P. 416 (Widney v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nessbit v. Superior Court
3 P.2d 558 (California Supreme Court, 1931)
Mechler v. Superior Court
259 P. 452 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)