Widney v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Widney v. Superior Court

258 P. 416, 84 Cal. App. 498, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 416

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 19, 1927

DocketDocket No. 5764.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 258 P. 416 (Widney v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Widney v. Superior Court, 258 P. 416, 84 Cal. App. 498, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 416 (Cal. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

In substance, the petitioner herein prays for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to allow a jury trial in a case wherein the right of trial by jury has been denied. [1] On the stated facts, set forth in the petition, mandate is not the appropriate remedy. (Donohue v. Superior Court, 93 Cal. 252 [28 P. 1043].)

Wherefore it is ordered by the court that the petition for writ of mandate be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

In substance, the petitioner herein prays for a writ of mandate to compel the Superior Court to allow a jury trial in a case wherein the right of trial by jury has been denied. [1] On the stated facts, set forth in the petition, mandate is not the appropriate remedy. (Donohue v. Superior Court, 93 Cal. 252 [28 P. 1043].)

Wherefore it is ordered by the court that the petition for writ of mandate be denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

258 P. 416, 84 Cal. App. 498, 1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widney-v-superior-court-calctapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack