Widner v. State
542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1224, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 1989 WL 49603
Opinion
Widner has appealed from a sentence imposed after remand by this court in Wid-ner v. State, 520 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The sentence is affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, as a condition of probation. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The sentence is in all other respects affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Widner v. State, 542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1224, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 1989 WL 49603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
542 So. 2d 1068 (Widner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ayers v. State
538 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Widner v. State
520 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)