Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Widner v. State

Widner v. State

542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1224, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 1989 WL 49603
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1989
DocketNo. 88-972
StatusPublished

This text of 542 So. 2d 1068 (Widner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Widner v. State, 542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1224, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 1989 WL 49603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

JOANOS, Judge.

Widner has appealed from a sentence imposed after remand by this court in Wid-ner v. State, 520 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The sentence is affirmed, but the trial court erred in imposing court costs without notice under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, as a condition of probation. Ayers v. State, 538 So.2d 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Consequently, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The sentence is in all other respects affirmed.

THOMPSON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ayers v. State
538 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Widner v. State
520 So. 2d 676 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1224, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2704, 1989 WL 49603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widner-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.