Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Widmer v. State

Widmer v. State

697 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 1997 WL 361484
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 2, 1997
DocketNo. 96-1117
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 697 So. 2d 545 (Widmer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Widmer v. State, 697 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 1997 WL 361484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

ALLEN, Judge.

Although the trial court found that the appellant had violated his probation, neither the revocation order nor the written transcript of the hearing delineates the specific evidence relied on or the particular violation or violations. Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 105 S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985), indicates that a probationer is entitled to a written statement as to these matters. See also Burton v. State, 651 So.2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The challenged revocation order is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded.

MINER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burst v. State
836 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Widmer v. State
747 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
E & I, INC. v. Excavators, Inc.
697 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 1997 WL 361484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widmer-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.