Widmer v. State
697 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 1997 WL 361484
Opinion
Although the trial court found that the appellant had violated his probation, neither the revocation order nor the written transcript of the hearing delineates the specific evidence relied on or the particular violation or violations. Black v. Romano, 471 U.S. 606, 105 S.Ct. 2254, 85 L.Ed.2d 636 (1985), indicates that a probationer is entitled to a written statement as to these matters. See also Burton v. State, 651 So.2d 793 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). The challenged revocation order is therefore reversed, and the case is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Widmer v. State, 697 So. 2d 545, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 7592, 1997 WL 361484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
697 So. 2d 545 (Widmer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burst v. State
836 So. 2d 1107 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Widmer v. State
747 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
E & I, INC. v. Excavators, Inc.
697 So. 2d 545 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)