WIDMARK ETIENNE v. LUDMILLA ETIENNE

District Court of Appeal of Florida

WIDMARK ETIENNE v. LUDMILLA ETIENNE

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2020

Docket19-0753

StatusPublished

This text of WIDMARK ETIENNE v. LUDMILLA ETIENNE (WIDMARK ETIENNE v. LUDMILLA ETIENNE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WIDMARK ETIENNE v. LUDMILLA ETIENNE, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Pincite

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

WIDMARK ETIENNE, Appellant,

v.

LUDMILLA ETIENNE, Appellee.

No. 4D19-753

[June 11, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael I. Rothschild, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 17- 013831.

Samuel D. Lopez of Samuel D. Lopez, P.A., Pembroke Pines, for appellant.

Richard Thierry Champagne of the Champagne Law Group, P.A., Quincy, Massachusetts, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI