Widman v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
This text of 252 A.D. 895 (Widman v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders denying defendant’s motions to vacate the note of examination of employees of the defendant reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motions granted, with ten dollars costs (one bill of costs). The record does not disclose that the examination of these witnesses is material and necessary in support of the plaintiff’s alleged cause of action; but, on the other hand, it appears that the witnesses have no personal knowledge thereof. In part the examination sought is on subjects that are a matter of record. Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 895, 300 N.Y.S. 138, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widman-v-socony-vacuum-oil-co-nyappdiv-1937.