Widincamp v. State

125 S.E. 732, 33 Ga. App. 149, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 785
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 9, 1924
Docket15933
StatusPublished

This text of 125 S.E. 732 (Widincamp v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Widincamp v. State, 125 S.E. 732, 33 Ga. App. 149, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 785 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Broxx.es, 0. J.

1. The exception to the overruling of the demurrer to the accusation, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, is treated as abandoned.

2. The venue of the offense was sufficiently proved and the evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Luhe and Bloodworth, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 732, 33 Ga. App. 149, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widincamp-v-state-gactapp-1924.