Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank

120 S.E. 665, 31 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 956

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 7, 1923

Docket15071

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 S.E. 665 (Widincamp v. Glennville Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Widincamp v. Glennville Bank, 120 S.E. 665, 31 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 956 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

The answer failed to show that the note sued on was without consideration. The defendant was originally liable on the note of anpther as indorser and thi§ liability furnished a consideration in [388]*388succession for each of the notes given thereafter in renewal. Also the plea was insufficient as a plea of fraud. Sasser v. McGovern, 11 Ga. App. 88 (74 S. E. 797); Haymans v. Bennett, 29 Ga. App. 265 (114 S. E. 923); Tennille Banking Co. v. Ward, 29 Ga. App. 660 (116 S. E. 347).

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI