Widgeon v. Southern Express Co.

45 S.E. 679, 118 Ga. 841, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 732
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 30, 1903·Published

Opinion

Candler, J.

Under no view of this ease could there he a recovery against the defendant company ; and therefore the judge of the superior court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and rendering final judgment in its favor.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Cited by counsel, as to immoral consideration : American Express Company v. Epply, 5 Ohio Dec. 337; Herrick v. Gallagher, 60 Barb. 566; 20 Ga. 449; 112 Ga. 850. Want of interest by plaintiff: 73 Ga. 472. Effect of the express company’s receipt: Hutch. Car. (2d ed.) §§ 240-1-3, 265; 104 Ala. 387, s. c. 16 So. 62; 94 Ga. 22; 77 N Y. 90, s. c. 28 Am. R. 112. M. B. Freeman, for plaintiff. Dessau, Harris & Harris, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Widgeon v. Southern Express Co., 45 S.E. 679, 118 Ga. 841, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 732 (Ga. 1903).

45 S.E. 679 (Widgeon v. Southern Express Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrick v. Gallagher
60 Barb. 566 (New York Supreme Court, 1871)
Ralston v. Boady
20 Ga. 449 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1856)
Lockhart v. Western & Atlantic Railroad
73 Ga. 472 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1885)
Bedell v. Richmond & Danville R. R.
20 S.E. 262 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Postelle v. Rivers
38 S.E. 109 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)
Smith v. Southern Express Co.
104 Ala. 387 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)