Widewaters Property Development Co. v. Katz

38 A.D.3d 1225, 834 N.Y.S.2d 889
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Widewaters Property Development Co. v. Katz. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.3d 1220
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2007·No. Appeal No. 2·Published

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Anthony J. Paris, J.), entered May 4, 2006. The order denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaims.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in part and dismissing the first counterclaim and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Widewaters Prop. Dev. Co., Inc. v Katz (38 AD3d 1220 [2007]). Present—Gorski, J.P, Smith, Lunn, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Widewaters Property Development Co. v. Katz, 38 A.D.3d 1225, 834 N.Y.S.2d 889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

38 A.D.3d 1225 (Widewaters Property Development Co. v. Katz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Widewaters Property Development Co. v. Katz
38 A.D.3d 1220 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)