Widener Mfg. Corp. v. United States

59 Cust. Ct. 903
United States Customs Court·Decided July 1, 1967·No. No. P67/385; No. P67/386·Published

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of nylon monofilament yarn similar in all material respects to that the subject of Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United States (56 Cust. Ct. 532, C.D. 2695), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Widener Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 903 (cusc 1967).

59 Cust. Ct. 903 (Widener Mfg. Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chester Tricot Mills, Inc. v. United States
56 Cust. Ct. 532 (U.S. Customs Court, 1966)