Wideman v. STRAX REJUVENATION AND AESTHETICS INSTITUTE, INC.
This text of 39 So. 3d 1273 (Wideman v. STRAX REJUVENATION AND AESTHETICS INSTITUTE, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ANVEL WIDEMAN and FRANKLIN WIDEMAN, her husband, Appellants,
v.
STRAX REJUVENATION AND AESTHETICS INSTITUTE, INC., and JEFFREY CARL HAMM, M.D., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Lisa S. Levine of Levine & Glassman, LLC, Weston, for appellant.
Dinah Stein and Michael S. Hirschkowitz of Hicks, Porter, Ebenfeld & Stein, P.A., Miami, and Chimpoulis & Hunter, P.A., Davie, for appellee, Strax Rejuvenation and Aesthetics Institute, Inc.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, C.J., CIKLIN, J., and KEYSER, JANIS B., Associate Judge, concur.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 So. 3d 1273, 2010 WL 3034360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wideman-v-strax-rejuvenation-and-aesthetics-institute-inc-fladistctapp-2010.