Wideman v. Lipman

Ohio Court of Appeals

Wideman v. Lipman

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 371

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wideman v. Lipman. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 Ohio App. 531 →

Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1928·Published

Opinion

VICKERY, J.

Where purchaser buying premises for $10,-000, paid $2,500, in junior mortgage bonds which vendor accepted at full value, relying on purchaser’s representations that they were worth full value, when at time there was action pending for foreclosure of mortgages on property and purchaser was party and knew or should have known that his bonds _ were worthless, vendor was entitled to rescission of contract and to be restored to all things lost because of transaction.

(Sullivan, PJ., and Levine, J., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VICKERY, J.

Where purchaser buying premises for $10,-000, paid $2,500, in junior mortgage bonds which vendor accepted at full value, relying on purchaser’s representations that they were worth full value, when at time there was action pending for foreclosure of mortgages on property and purchaser was party and knew or should have known that his bonds _ were worthless, vendor was entitled to rescission of contract and to be restored to all things lost because of transaction.

(Sullivan, PJ., and Levine, J., concur.)

For reference to full opinion, see Omnibus Index, last page, this issue.

Wideman v. Lipman, 6 Ohio Law. Abs. 371 (Ohio Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

6 Ohio Law. Abs. 371 (Wideman v. Lipman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.