Wideman v. Hawaii Paroling Authority

• Court: Hawaii Supreme Court
• Decided: November 8, 2013
• Docket: SCWC-13-0000065
• Status: Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000065 08-NOV-2013 09:01 AM

SCWC-13-0000065

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I

LONNELL REGINALD WIDEMAN,

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs.

HAWAI'I PAROLING AUTHORITY,

Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-13-0000065 AND CAAP-13-0000111)

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-

referenced matter not having been filed by the Intermediate Court

of Appeals at the time the application for writ of certiorari was

filed, see Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp. 2011); see

also Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 36(b)(1)

(2012),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner­

Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed November 4,

2013, is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the application

pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (2012) (“The application shall be

filed within thirty days after the filing of the intermediate

court of appeals’ judgment on appeal or dismissal order, unless

the time for filing the application is extended in accordance

with this rule.”).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 8, 2013.

Lonnell Reginald Wideman, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald petitioner pro se

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack