Wideman v. Franks
3 P. 494, 2 Cal. Unrep. 288
This text of 3 P. 494 (Wideman v. Franks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wideman v. Franks, 3 P. 494, 2 Cal. Unrep. 288 (Cal. 1884).
Opinion
We think the evidence is sufficient to justify the finding that the transaction between Alvarado and plaintiff was fraudulent and void as to the creditors of the former.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 P. 494, 2 Cal. Unrep. 288, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wideman-v-franks-cal-1884.