Wideman v. Barbel Trucking, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wideman v. Barbel Trucking, Inc.

3 A.D.3d 449, 770 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 732

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 27, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.3d 449 (Wideman v. Barbel Trucking, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wideman v. Barbel Trucking, Inc., 3 A.D.3d 449, 770 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 732 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

[450]*450Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered on or about September 19, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant earlier moved to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, based on defective service. It later argued that inasmuch as this action did not commence until service was then properly made, it had the right to submit another dismissal motion based upon lack of long-arm jurisdiction. But defendant’s prior appearance and motion constituted a submission to the court’s jurisdiction and a waiver of the long-arm jurisdictional defense (CPLR 3211 [e]; Wiesener v Avis Rent-A-Car, 182 AD2d 372 [1992]; see also Urena v NYNEX, Inc., 223 AD2d 442 [1996]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[450]*450Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice Bowman, J.), entered on or about September 19, 2003, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant earlier moved to dismiss on jurisdictional grounds, based on defective service. It later argued that inasmuch as this action did not commence until service was then properly made, it had the right to submit another dismissal motion based upon lack of long-arm jurisdiction. But defendant’s prior appearance and motion constituted a submission to the court’s jurisdiction and a waiver of the long-arm jurisdictional defense (CPLR 3211 [e]; Wiesener v Avis Rent-A-Car, 182 AD2d 372 [1992]; see also Urena v NYNEX, Inc., 223 AD2d 442 [1996]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.3d 449, 770 N.Y.S.2d 723, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wideman-v-barbel-trucking-inc-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack