Widelitz v. Dumain

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Widelitz v. Dumain

218 A.D.2d 777, 630 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 218 A.D.2d 777 (Widelitz v. Dumain) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Widelitz v. Dumain, 218 A.D.2d 777, 630 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a Proceeding to invalidate a petition designating certain of the respondents as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 12,1995, for the Republican Party positions of Male and Female Members of the Republican State Committee, Delegates and Alternate Delegates to the 2nd Judicial District Republican Convention, and Members of the Kings County Republican County Committee from the 46th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 9,1995, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s finding, based upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses, that the appellants did not demonstrate any fraud or impropriety regarding the objections filed against them (see, Matter of Eve v Mahoney, 45 AD2d 945).

[778]*778The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a Proceeding to invalidate a petition designating certain of the respondents as candidates in a primary election to be held on September 12,1995, for the Republican Party positions of Male and Female Members of the Republican State Committee, Delegates and Alternate Delegates to the 2nd Judicial District Republican Convention, and Members of the Kings County Republican County Committee from the 46th Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kramer, J.), dated August 9,1995, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We agree with the Supreme Court’s finding, based upon its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses, that the appellants did not demonstrate any fraud or impropriety regarding the objections filed against them (see, Matter of Eve v Mahoney, 45 AD2d 945).

[778]*778The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Santucci, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

218 A.D.2d 777, 630 N.Y.S.2d 953, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/widelitz-v-dumain-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack