Wicksel v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wicksel v. Cohen

240 A.D. 863

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 863 (Wicksel v. Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wicksel v. Cohen, 240 A.D. 863 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts and the matter remitted to the Special Term to determine as expeditiously as possible whether there are 1,500 valid [864]*864signatures to the petition. We are of opinion that the objector was a proper party to file objections in the proceeding and that there are questions of fact to be decided by the Special Term. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts and the matter remitted to the Special Term to determine as expeditiously as possible whether there are 1,500 valid [864]*864signatures to the petition. We are of opinion that the objector was a proper party to file objections in the proceeding and that there are questions of fact to be decided by the Special Term. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wicksel-v-cohen-nyappdiv-1933.