Wicks v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance
111 N.Y.S. 65
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1905·Published
Opinion
As we have concluded on the appeal by the plaintiff from the judgment that the plaintiff was entitled to recover for the awnings destroyed by the fire, the tender of the defendant was not sufficient, and therefore was not a defense to this action.
It follows that this judgment should be affirmed, with costs. Ah concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wicks v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance, 111 N.Y.S. 65 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
111 N.Y.S. 65 (Wicks v. London & Lancashire Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.