Wickham & Goshorn v. Lewis Martin & Co.

13 Gratt. 427
CourtSupreme Court of Virginia
DecidedAugust 25, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by48 cases

This text of 13 Gratt. 427 (Wickham & Goshorn v. Lewis Martin & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wickham & Goshorn v. Lewis Martin & Co., 13 Gratt. 427 (Va. 1856).

Opinions

Samuels, J.

I am of opinion that it is not necessary for the decision of this case, to determine what manner of fraud practiced by a vendee in obtaining goods on credit, will justify the vendor in retaining the goods and annulling the sale thereof. Whether a purchase by an insolvent vendee without intention to pay will justify reclamation by the vendor, or whether the vendor must have industriously used artifice and stratagem in the purchase to warrant such reclamation, are questions which become immaterial in this case from the fact that the goods were subsequently sold by the vendee Graff to Wickham and Goshorn, purchasers for value without notice. If therefore, whether Graff had been guilty of no fraud in buying the goods, or had bought them, knowing his own insolvency, and without the purpose of paying for them, or had industriously used devices to deceive the sellers, still Wickham and Goshorn, subsequent purchasers for [431]*431value without notice, have a title better than that of Martin Lewis & Co. the original sellers. See Williams v. Given, 6 Gratt. 268.

I am further of opinion that the case of Pryor v. Kuhn, 12 Gratt. 615, was correctly decided, and should be followed in all cases in which it applies. That the rule of Bennett v. Hardaway, 6 Munf. 125, as modified by Ewing v. Ewing, 2 Leigh 337, Green v. Ashby, 6 Leigh 135, Rohr v. Davis, 9 Leigh 30, and Pasley v. English, 5 Gratt. 141, should give the rule in cases wherein the courts perform the functions of a jury, as well as in those wherein juries are impanneled. Ascertaining the facts of this case by the rule prescribed by these cases, I am of opinion that the deed of trust given in evidence by the plaintiffs, the making of which is not questioned, and the proof offered by the defendants admitting it to be all true, fully establish the plaintiffs’ right to recover. I therefore concur in the judgment to be rendered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Souders v. Leatherbury
125 S.E. 236 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1924)
Myers v. Cook
87 W. Va. 265 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1920)
Cassiday Fork Boom & Lumber Co. v. Terry
73 S.E. 278 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1911)
Trustees of American Bank v. McComb
54 S.E. 14 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
Hurst & Co. v. Leckie
34 S.E. 464 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1899)
Miller v. White
33 S.E. 332 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1899)
Long v. Meriden Britannia Co.
27 S.E. 499 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1897)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Powell
26 S.E. 828 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1897)
Chapman v. Chapman
21 S.E. 813 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1895)
Peters v. Bain
133 U.S. 670 (Supreme Court, 1890)
Ruffner Bros. v. Mairs
11 S.E. 5 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1890)
Joslyn v. State Bank
10 S.E. 166 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1889)
Lewis' Adm'r v. Glenn
6 S.E. 866 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1888)
Lamb v. Pannell
28 W. Va. 663 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1886)
Duncan, Ford & Elder v. Custard
24 W. Va. 730 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1884)
Harden v. Wagner
22 W. Va. 356 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1883)
Bockover v. Life Ass'n of America
77 Va. 85 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1883)
Gordon v. Rixey
76 Va. 694 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1882)
Ramsburg v. Erb
16 W. Va. 777 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1880)
Frank v. Lilienfeld
33 Va. 377 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Gratt. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wickham-goshorn-v-lewis-martin-co-va-1856.