Wickershaff v. Jones
29 F. Cas. 1134
This text of 29 F. Cas. 1134 (Wickershaff v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wickershaff v. Jones, 29 F. Cas. 1134 (circtedpa 1848).
Opinion
[Cited in 2 Whart. Dig. 413, to the point that the presumption of novelty and usefulness arising from the issue of a patent may be rebutted by affidavits on an application for an injunction, if the patent is not ancient. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 F. Cas. 1134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wickershaff-v-jones-circtedpa-1848.