Wicker v. Wicker

122 S.E.2d 703, 255 N.C. 723, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 676
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 22, 1961·No. 528·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*724 Per Curiam.

The previous action, a habeas corpus proceeding to determine the custody of the children of the marriage involved in the instant case, was heard by the trial judge who, sitting without a jury, found as a fact, among other things, that Nellie Grace Yow Wicker had not committed adultery with any person, and entered judgment in accordance therewith.

G.S. 50-10 requires that, in a divorce action, the material facts as to the grounds for divorce must be- found by a jury. Carpenter v. Carpenter, 244 N.C. 286, 93 S.E. 2d 617.

Thus, it is patent that the order entered in the habeas corpus proceeding based on facts found by the trial judge is not res judicata to this action for divorce upon the ground of adultery.

Hence, the order from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wicker v. Wicker, 122 S.E.2d 703, 255 N.C. 723, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 676 (N.C. 1961).

122 S.E.2d 703 (Wicker v. Wicker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fulton v. Vickery
326 S.E.2d 354 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1985)
Morris v. Morris
262 S.E.2d 359 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Eudy v. Eudy
215 S.E.2d 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1975)