Wicker v. Wicker
This text of 122 S.E.2d 703 (Wicker v. Wicker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The previous action, a habeas corpus proceeding to determine the custody of the children of the marriage involved in the instant case, was heard by the trial judge who, sitting without a jury, found as a fact, among other things, that Nellie Grace Yow Wicker had not committed adultery with any person, and entered judgment in accordance therewith.
G.S. 50-10 requires that, in a divorce action, the material facts as to the grounds for divorce must be- found by a jury. Carpenter v. Carpenter, 244 N.C. 286, 93 S.E. 2d 617.
Thus, it is patent that the order entered in the habeas corpus proceeding based on facts found by the trial judge is not res judicata to this action for divorce upon the ground of adultery.
Hence, the order from which appeal is taken is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 S.E.2d 703, 255 N.C. 723, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wicker-v-wicker-nc-1961.