Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.

154 P.2d 512, 66 Idaho 14, 1944 Ida. LEXIS 57

CourtIdaho Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 21, 1944

DocketNo. 7144.

StatusPublished

This text of 154 P.2d 512 (Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co., 154 P.2d 512, 66 Idaho 14, 1944 Ida. LEXIS 57 (Idaho 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The above entitled cause was consolidated for trial with the case of Beecher et al v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., a corporation, et al. Separate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree were made and entered in each case, and appeals separately prosecuted. The evidence, so far as the material questions involved are concerned, is substantially the same, and no useful purpose would be served by the preparation of two opinions.

*15 The above entitled cause is governed and controlled by Beecher et al. v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., et al., ante p. 1. Similar decree will be entered herein and when so entered, affirmed.

Ailshie, J., concurs in the conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

The above entitled cause was consolidated for trial with the case of Beecher et al v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., a corporation, et al. Separate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree were made and entered in each case, and appeals separately prosecuted. The evidence, so far as the material questions involved are concerned, is substantially the same, and no useful purpose would be served by the preparation of two opinions.

*15 The above entitled cause is governed and controlled by Beecher et al. v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., et al., ante p. 1. Similar decree will be entered herein and when so entered, affirmed.

Ailshie, J., concurs in the conclusion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 P.2d 512, 66 Idaho 14, 1944 Ida. LEXIS 57, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wickel-v-cassia-creek-irrigation-co-idaho-1944.