Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.

154 P.2d 512, 66 Idaho 14, 1944 Ida. LEXIS 57
Idaho Supreme Court·Decided December 21, 1944·No. No. 7144.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

The above entitled cause was consolidated for trial with the case of Beecher et al v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., a corporation, et al. Separate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and decree were made and entered in each case, and appeals separately prosecuted. The evidence, so far as the material questions involved are concerned, is substantially the same, and no useful purpose would be served by the preparation of two opinions.

*15 The above entitled cause is governed and controlled by Beecher et al. v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Company, Inc., et al., ante p. 1. Similar decree will be entered herein and when so entered, affirmed.

Ailshie, J., concurs in the conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co., 154 P.2d 512, 66 Idaho 14, 1944 Ida. LEXIS 57 (Idaho 1944).

154 P.2d 512 (Wickel v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.