Wick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
161 F.2d 732
Opinion
George D. WICK, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
G. Walter Smith, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Wick, Smith & Hodel, of Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.
Helen Goodner, Tax Division Dept. of Justice, of Washington, D. C. (Sewall Key, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and Helen R. Carloss, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.
Before MARIS, GOODRICH, and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
For the reasons well stated in the opinion of Judge Harron, 7 T.C. 723, the decision of the Tax Court will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 161 F.2d 732 (3d Cir. 1947).
161 F.2d 732 (Wick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wick v. Commissioner
7 T.C. 723 (U.S. Tax Court, 1946)