Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Wood

284 S.W. 301, 1926 Tex. App. LEXIS 930

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: April 15, 1926
• Docket: No. 1891.
• Status: Published

Opinion

HIGGINS, J.

Appellee sued to recover the sum of $125, the value of a mule alleged to have been killed by a train of appellant, and the further sum of $20 as an attorney’s fee, under article 2178, Vernon’s Sayles’ Ann. Civ. St. 1914. Upon trial, without a jury, he recovered judgment as prayed for. The appellant’s right of way was fenced, but the fence was in bad state of repair, being in places not over 18 inches high. It is asserted the evidence is insufficient to show that the animal entered upon the right of way over the defective fence instead of through a gate which had been placed in the fence for the convenience of the owner of the land upon both sides of the right of way; also that it is insufficient to show that the injuries which caused the animal’s death were inflicted by a train of appellant. We have examined the evidence and regard it as sufficient to support findings adverse to these contentions.

Upon the trial no evidence was offered to show the reasonable amount of an attorney’s fee in the case. Appellant assigns as error the insufficiency of the evidence in this respect. This is well taken. St. Louis, S. W. Ry. Co. v. Claybon (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 488; Quanah, A & P. R. Co. v. Price (Tex. Civ. App.) 192 S. W. 805; Quanah, A. & P. R. Co. v. Watkins (Tex. Civ. App.) 193 S. W. 356.

This is a matter which may be cured by remittitur. If, in 20 days, a remittitur of $20 upon the judgment be filed by appellee, the judgment will be affirmed; if it be not so filed, the judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Affirmed conditionally.