Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett

Supreme Court

Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett

242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 214, 61 L. Ed. 531, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1417

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 18, 1916·No. No. 535·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 668 et seq.; Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U. S. 346, 353; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 97; Kerfoot v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, 218 U. S. 281, 288; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228., U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. B. Stuart, Mr. A. C. Cruce, Mr. M. K. Cruce and Mr. Weldon M. Bailey for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Dower v. Richards, 151 U. S. 658, 668 et seq.; Thayer v. Spratt, 189 U. S. 346, 353; Waters-Pierce Oil Co. v. Texas, 212 U. S. 86, 97; Kerfoot v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank, 218 U. S. 281, 288; (2) Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102, 105; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228., U. S. 596, 600; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471-472. Mr. Joseph M. Bryson, Mr. Alexander Britton and Mr. Evans Browne for the plaintiff in error. Mr. C. B. Stuart, Mr. A. C. Cruce, Mr. M. K. Cruce and Mr. Weldon M. Bailey for the defendant in error.

Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett, 242 U.S. 619, 37 S. Ct. 214, 61 L. Ed. 531, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1417 (1916).

Pincite

242 U.S. 619 (Wichita Falls & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Puckett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related