Wible v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION

40 So. 3d 926, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11420, 2010 WL 3035143
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 2010·No. 1D10-0239·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John R. Wible appeals an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming an appeals referee’s decision holding him to be disqualified from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits. By confession of error, the Commission acknowledges that its decision failed to take into consideration this court’s rulings in Doig v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 862 So.2d 76 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003), and Seneca v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 39 So.3d 385 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010), which hold that in circumstances such as those present here, a claimant is not disqualified from benefits. In accordance with the Commission’s confession of error, we reverse the final order being appealed herein, and remand the *927 matter to the Commission for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and MARSTILLER, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wible v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, 40 So. 3d 926, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11420, 2010 WL 3035143 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

40 So. 3d 926 (Wible v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lakey v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission
43 So. 3d 955 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)