WIBBENMEYER v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

WIBBENMEYER v. Director of Revenue

182 S.W.3d 693, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 66, 2006 WL 119129

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 17, 2006

DocketED 85762

StatusPublished

This text of 182 S.W.3d 693 (WIBBENMEYER v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WIBBENMEYER v. Director of Revenue, 182 S.W.3d 693, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 66, 2006 WL 119129 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals the judgment reinstating the driving privileges of Paul A. Wibbenmeyer after an administrative suspension. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Director of Revenue appeals the judgment reinstating the driving privileges of Paul A. Wibbenmeyer after an administrative suspension. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and no error of law appears. The trial court’s judgment was supported by substantial evidence on the record. No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the general principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

182 S.W.3d 693, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 66, 2006 WL 119129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wibbenmeyer-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack