Wiater v. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc.

705 N.W.2d 687, 474 Mich. 918, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2283
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wiater v. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 Mich. 896
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2005·No. 128139·Published

Opinion

705 N.W.2d 687 (2005)
474 Mich. 917-18

Wiater
v.
Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc.

No. 128139.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 10, 2005.

Application for Leave to Appeal.

SC: 128139, COA: 250384.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument: (1) whether this danger was open and obvious, (2) which party has the burden to prove that a special aspect exists, and (3) whether defendant's failure to undertake measures to diminish the alleged risk itself constituted a "special aspect" under Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc., 464 Mich. 512, 516, 629 N.W.2d 384 (2001). The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting a mere restatement of the arguments made in their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wiater v. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc., 705 N.W.2d 687, 474 Mich. 918, 2005 Mich. LEXIS 2283 (Mich. 2005).

705 N.W.2d 687 (Wiater v. Great Lakes Recovery Centers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.
629 N.W.2d 384 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2001)