Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 878 F.3d 1364
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 18, 2017·No. 15-1944·Published

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

WI-FI ONE, LLC, Appellant

v.

BROADCOM CORPORATION, Appellee

MICHELLE K. LEE, DIRECTOR, U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________

2015-1944, 2015-1945, 2015-1946 ______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade- mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00601, IPR2013-00602, IPR2013-00636. ______________________

ORDER ______________________

PER CURIAM. The court’s order of January 4, 2017, is clarified as follows: (1) The appeals are consolidated for purposes of brief- ing and oral argument en banc. 2 WI-FI ONE, LLC v. BROADCOM CORPORATION

(2) Appellant will file a single opening supplemental brief; Appellee will file a single supplemental brief; Inter- venor will file a single supplemental brief; and Appellant will file a single reply brief. (3) The single-brief requirement applies to any ami- cus brief as well.

FOR THE COURT

January 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2017).

Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation (Wi-Fi One, LLC v. Broadcom Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.