Whyte ex rel. SemGroup Litigation Trust v. Barclays Bank PLC

644 F. App'x 60
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 24, 2016
DocketNo. 13-2653-CV
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 644 F. App'x 60 (Whyte ex rel. SemGroup Litigation Trust v. Barclays Bank PLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whyte ex rel. SemGroup Litigation Trust v. Barclays Bank PLC, 644 F. App'x 60 (2d Cir. 2016).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Bettina M. Whyte, as Trustee of the SemGroup Litigation Trust, appeals from the district court’s June 12, 2013, judgment granting defendants’ motions to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The district court held that “the [Bankruptcy Code’s] section 546(g) ‘safe harbor’ impliedly preempts state-law fraudulent conveyance actions seeking to avoid ‘swap transactions’ as defined by the Code.” Whyte v. Barclays Bank PLC, 494 B.R. 196, 201 (S.D.N.Y.2013). We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in In re: Tribune Company Fraudulent Conveyance Litigation, 13-3992-cv; 13-3875-cv; 13-4178-cv; 13-4196-cv, which was heard in tandem with the present matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
644 F. App'x 60, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whyte-ex-rel-semgroup-litigation-trust-v-barclays-bank-plc-ca2-2016.