Whyler v. Van Tiger
14 P. 846, 2 Cal. Unrep. 800
Opinion
There is no error in the record. We think that Mrs. Whyler was a guardian when she executed the lease to defendant, and that, the lease was properly executed.
The judgment must be affirmed. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whyler v. Van Tiger, 14 P. 846, 2 Cal. Unrep. 800 (Cal. 1887).
14 P. 846 (Whyler v. Van Tiger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bessho v. General Petroleum Corp.
199 P. 22 (California Supreme Court, 1921)
Southern T. C. Bk. v. S.D. Sav. Bk.
187 P. 435 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Southern Trust & Commerce Bank v. San Diego Savings Bank
45 Cal. App. 294 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of Morehouse
169 P. 365 (California Supreme Court, 1917)
Elizalde v. Elizalde
66 P. 369 (California Supreme Court, 1902)
Dennis v. Bint
54 P. 378 (California Supreme Court, 1898)