Whud Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Oak Grove, Ltd.

699 So. 2d 842, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11112, 1997 WL 600202
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1997·No. No. 97-755·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We cannot conclude on the record before us that the lower court’s refusal to compel the appellee’s deposit of rents into the court’s registry pending final adjudication was a clear abuse of discretion granted under section 697.07(4), Florida Statutes (1995). Nor can we find error in the court’s denial of an assignment of the rents to the appellants [843]*843pursuant to section 697.07(3) where the court correctly determined that there was a bona fide dispute between the parties as to whether the appellee was in default of the mortgage. Accordingly, we affirm the non-final order under review.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whud Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Oak Grove, Ltd., 699 So. 2d 842, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 11112, 1997 WL 600202 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

699 So. 2d 842 (Whud Real Estate Ltd. Partnership v. Oak Grove, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SEASPRAY RESORT LTD. v. UCF 1 TRUST 1
260 So. 3d 333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Wane v. U.S. Bank, National Ass'n
128 So. 3d 932 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Tidewater Estates Co-Op, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
83 So. 3d 912 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
National Loan Investors, L.P. v. Joymar Associates
812 So. 2d 582 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Guzman & Co. v. British Realty & Mortg. Corp.
699 So. 2d 842 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)