Whorton v. State
179 So. 398, 28 Ala. App. 107, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 65
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction in proceedings in bastardy, and has been submitted in this court without an-assignment of errors. The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken must therefore stand affirmed for want -of assignment of errors. Williams v. State, 117 Ala. 199, 23 So. 42.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whorton v. State, 179 So. 398, 28 Ala. App. 107, 1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 65 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938).
179 So. 398 (Whorton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eason v. State
4 So. 2d 190 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1941)