Whorton v. City of Hollis Ex Rel. Shannon

1944 OK 314, 153 P.2d 229, 194 Okla. 478, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 505
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 14, 1944
DocketNo. 31059.
StatusPublished

This text of 1944 OK 314 (Whorton v. City of Hollis Ex Rel. Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whorton v. City of Hollis Ex Rel. Shannon, 1944 OK 314, 153 P.2d 229, 194 Okla. 478, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 505 (Okla. 1944).

Opinion

BAYLESS, J.

B. F. Whorton et al. appeal from a judgment of the district court of Harmon county foreclosing the lien of delinquent assessments levied in connection with a street improvement district. The action was brought on relation of the city of Hollis for the benefit of the bondholders.

The district was created in 1926, under authority of chapter 173, S. L. 1923', 11 O. S. 1941 §§81-113, and the bonds were issued December 4, 1926. The annual installments of the respective assessments fell due September 1, 1927, and on the like month and day until September 1, 1936. The bonds matured October 1, 1936. The action was filed July 30, 1940.

The only issue presented to us is whether the action was barred by the statute of limitations when filed.

The rule announced in City of Bristow v. Groom, 194 Okla. 384, 151 P. 2d 936, governs. We held (1) that the *479 lien is subject to the limitations stated in 12 O. S. 1941 §95 (2), and (2) the cause of action arose when a delinquency as to the annual installments assessed for the payment of the bonds existed for a period of 12 months subsequent to the due date of the last annual installment.

In this case the last installment matured September 1, 1936, and at the lapse oí 12 months thereafter there existed a delinquency as to the annual installments for several years. The cause of action arose September 1, 1937, and the suit being filed July 30, 1940, was filed before the action was barred.

The judgment is affirmed.

CORN, C.J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, HURST, and DAVISON, JJ., concur. GIBSON, V.C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. Groom
1944 OK 223 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1944 OK 314, 153 P.2d 229, 194 Okla. 478, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whorton-v-city-of-hollis-ex-rel-shannon-okla-1944.