Whoriskey v. Old Colony Railroad

173 Mass. 432, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1113
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 19, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 173 Mass. 432 (Whoriskey v. Old Colony Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Whoriskey v. Old Colony Railroad, 173 Mass. 432, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1113 (Mass. 1899).

Opinion

Knowlton, J.

This case is governed by the language of St. 1890, c. 428, § 5, as amended by St. 1891, c. 123, and by the [433]*433decision in Gately v. Old Colony Railroad, 171 Mass. 494. Under this statute, there can be a recovery of damages only upon a petition “ brought within one year after the day of the date of the decree of the court confirming the decision ” of the commission appointed under § 1 of St. 1890, c. 428. It is argued that the words, “ in the same manner and under like rules of law as damages may be determined when occasioned by the taking of land for the locating and laying out of railroads and public ways, respectively,” adopt into this statute the provisions of the Pub. Sts. c. 49, §§ 88, 89, in regard to bringing a petition within six months after the land is actually entered upon in certain cases. But we think it very clear that these words do not modify the previous requirements that a petition, in order to be entertained, must be brought within one year after the date of the decree. See also Burnett v. Boston, ante, 173.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gately v. Old Colony Railroad
51 N.E. 5 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 Mass. 432, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whoriskey-v-old-colony-railroad-mass-1899.