Wholesale Liquor Licenses of Thomas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Wholesale Liquor Licenses of Thomas

32 A. 100, 169 Pa. 111, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1076

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJune 3, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 9

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 32 A. 100 (Wholesale Liquor Licenses of Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wholesale Liquor Licenses of Thomas, 32 A. 100, 169 Pa. 111, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1076 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This was an application for a wholesale liquor license. The record shows that the case was heard, considered and decided by the learned court below, and that the license was refused on the ground that in the opinion of the’court it was not necessary. It is true it was the individual opinion of the judge upon which this action was taken, but we have so many times held that such opinion may be the basis of decision that we regard the subject as settled, and do not deem it necessary to review the cases or to change them : Gross’s License, 161 Pa. 344; Mead’s License 161 Pa. 375; American Brewing Co.’s License, 161 Pa. 378; Kelminski’s App., 164 Pa. 231.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This was an application for a wholesale liquor license. The record shows that the case was heard, considered and decided by the learned court below, and that the license was refused on the ground that in the opinion of the’court it was not necessary. It is true it was the individual opinion of the judge upon which this action was taken, but we have so many times held that such opinion may be the basis of decision that we regard the subject as settled, and do not deem it necessary to review the cases or to change them : Gross’s License, 161 Pa. 344; Mead’s License 161 Pa. 375; American Brewing Co.’s License, 161 Pa. 378; Kelminski’s App., 164 Pa. 231.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of appellants.

In the Matter of The Application of Grain Belt Express LLC for an Amendment to Its Certificate of Convenience and necessity Authorizing It to Construct, Own, Operate, Control, Manage and Maintain a High Voltage, Direct Current Transmission Line and Associated Converter Station; Missouri Public Service Commission v. Missouri Farm Bureau, Missouri Soybean Association and Missouri Cattlemen's Association

Missouri Court of Appeals, 2024

Cambria County Liquor Licenses

78 Pa. Super. 28 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Cambria County Brewers' Licenses

78 Pa. Super. 40 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)

Indian Brewing Co.'s License

75 A. 29 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1909)

McGinley's License

32 Pa. Super. 324 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)

Donoghue's License

5 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 A. 100, 169 Pa. 111, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wholesale-liquor-licenses-of-thomas-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack