Whobrey v. Merchandise Pickup Services Inc.
355 S.W.3d 570, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1720, 2011 WL 6835249
Opinion
ORDER
Tim Whobrey (Claimant) appeals from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) denying him unemployment benefits. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Whobrey v. Merchandise Pickup Services Inc., 355 S.W.3d 570, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1720, 2011 WL 6835249 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
355 S.W.3d 570 (Whobrey v. Merchandise Pickup Services Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hall v. Podleski
355 S.W.3d 570 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)