Whitzell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whitzell v. State

115 So. 419, 22 Ala. App. 329, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 31

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 14, 1928

Docket7 Div. 384.

StatusPublished

This text of 115 So. 419 (Whitzell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitzell v. State, 115 So. 419, 22 Ala. App. 329, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 31 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

The evidence was all to the effect that the offense for which appellant was convicted was committed in De Kalb county in the state of Alabama. This being true, it was immaterial in the case as to what, if any, action was taken against the defendant by the Georgia authorities, in the state of Georgia.

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court, as shown by the bill of exceptions, or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. ■

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The evidence was all to the effect that the offense for which appellant was convicted was committed in De Kalb county in the state of Alabama. This being true, it was immaterial in the case as to what, if any, action was taken against the defendant by the Georgia authorities, in the state of Georgia.

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court, as shown by the bill of exceptions, or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. ■

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 So. 419, 22 Ala. App. 329, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitzell-v-state-alactapp-1928.