Whitzell v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Whitzell v. State

115 So. 419, 22 Ala. App. 329, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 31

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1928·No. 7 Div. 384.·Published

Opinion

RICE, J.

The evidence was all to the effect that the offense for which appellant was convicted was committed in De Kalb county in the state of Alabama. This being true, it was immaterial in the case as to what, if any, action was taken against the defendant by the Georgia authorities, in the state of Georgia.

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court, as shown by the bill of exceptions, or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. ■

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

The evidence was all to the effect that the offense for which appellant was convicted was committed in De Kalb county in the state of Alabama. This being true, it was immaterial in the case as to what, if any, action was taken against the defendant by the Georgia authorities, in the state of Georgia.

We find no error in the rulings of the trial court, as shown by the bill of exceptions, or in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. ■

Affirmed.

Whitzell v. State, 115 So. 419, 22 Ala. App. 329, 1928 Ala. App. LEXIS 31 (Ala. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

115 So. 419 (Whitzell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.