Whitworth v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Whitworth v. Anderson

54 Ala. 33

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedDecember 15, 1875

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 54 Ala. 33 (Whitworth v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Whitworth v. Anderson, 54 Ala. 33 (Ala. 1875).

Pincite

Opinion

BBICKELL, C. J.

The chancellor dismissed appellants’ bill, on motion, because they had not complied with section 93 of the revenue law of 1868, by depositing double the amount of the sum for which the lands, the subject of suit, had been sold for the payment of taxes, &c. The court was [34]*34in error in sustaining the motion. The section of the revenue law of 1868, referred to, has been, by this court, declared unconstitutional.—Stoudenmire v. Brown, 48 Ala. 699.

The decree of the chancellor must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BBICKELL, C. J.

The chancellor dismissed appellants’ bill, on motion, because they had not complied with section 93 of the revenue law of 1868, by depositing double the amount of the sum for which the lands, the subject of suit, had been sold for the payment of taxes, &c. The court was [34]*34in error in sustaining the motion. The section of the revenue law of 1868, referred to, has been, by this court, declared unconstitutional.—Stoudenmire v. Brown, 48 Ala. 699.

The decree of the chancellor must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 Ala. 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/whitworth-v-anderson-ala-1875.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack