Whittum v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 22, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-01777·Unknown

Opinion

SPO MARK F. ROACH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8237 ANDREW C. GREEN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9399 KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON & HALUCK, LLP 300 S. 4th St., Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Phone: (702) 853-5500 Fax: (702) 853-5599 mark.roach@knchlaw.com andrew.green@knchlaw.com Attorneys for Defendant, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER LEISA WHITTUM; and NICOLE ) CASE NO.: 2:21-CV-01777-MMD-EJY KILBURN, ) ) STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ) v. ) ) UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF ) ) Defendant. ) Subject to the approval of this Court, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to the following Protective Order: The complaint in this matter (Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, ECF #15) includes class-action allegations, whereby Plaintiffs assert to be representatives for a putative class of unnamed individuals whom Plaintiffs contend are entitled to recover damages for causes of action within the operative complaint alleging that putative class members’, "personal data was procured or potentially prepared by third parties as a result of the data breach due to UMC's failure to secure its internal systems of record.” (Id.) The parties acknowledge Defendant is a hospital, and that the operative complaint identifies putative class members as patients or others whose data is required to be protected from disclosure, and for which the instance of Plaintiffs’ operative complaint and the procedures of the litigation may not create authorization for disclosure. The parties also acknowledge that discoverable information that may pertain to this matter may be not previously published or generally available pursuant to legitimate interests and protection of sensitive information that may be protected personal information, proprietary, trade secrets, subject to non-disclosure agreements, important to safety and security, and intended to assist preservation of confidentiality, privacy and/or protection from disclosure pursuant to law and/or agreement. The parties therefore agree to the terms and substance of this stipulated protective order in an effort to facilitate discovery while protecting any sensitive information from improper disclosure. Based thereon and to expedite the flow of discovery, facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality and protection of information of others, and to adequately protect material claimed to be confidential, private, sensitive and/or subject to protection, and ensure that protection is afforded to Defendant, UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) for disclosures or productions it may make or be required to make, and pursuant to the Court’s authority under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), it is hereby ORDERED that this Protective Order shall govern the disclosure, handling and disposition disclosure and productions by Defendant as follows: 1. Application. This Protective Order shall govern any disclosure or production in this case that contains confidential or private information, designated as containing “Confidential Information” as defined herein and produced in connection with this litigation by any person or entity [hereinafter referred to as the “producing party”], whether in response to a discovery request, subpoena or otherwise, to any other person or entity [hereinafter referred to as the “receiving party”], regardless of whether the person or entity producing or receiving such information is a party to this litigation. 2. Definitions. 2.1 Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” shall mean and include any and all of the following: (a) information supplied in any form, or any portion thereof, that identifies an individual or subscriber in any manner and relates to the past, present, or future care, services, or supplies relating to the physical or mental health or condition of such individual or subscriber, the provision of health care to such individual or subscriber, or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to such individual or subscriber. Confidential Health Information shall constitute a subset of Confidential Information, and shall be designated as Confidential Information and subject to all other terms and conditions governing the treatment of Confidential Information, as set forth herein. Confidential Health Information shall include, but is not limited to, claim data, claim forms, grievances, appeals, or other documents or records that contain any patient health information required to be kept confidential under any state or federal law, including 45 C.F.R. Parts 160 and 164 promulgated pursuant to HIPAA (see 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.501 & 160.103), and the following subscriber, patient, or member identifiers including but not limited to: (1)names; (2) all geographic subdivisions smaller than a State, including street address, city, county, precinct, and zip code; (3) all elements of dates (except year) for dates directly related to an individual, including birth date, admission date, discharge date, age, and date of death; (4)telephone numbers; (5)fax numbers; (6)electronic mail addresses; (7)social security numbers; (8)medical record numbers; (9)health plan beneficiary numbers; (10)account numbers; (11)certificate/license numbers; (12) vehicle identifiers and serial numbers, including license plate numbers; (13)device identifiers and serial numbers; (14)web universal resource locators (“URLs”); (15)internet protocol (“IP”) address numbers; (16)biometric identifiers, including finger and voice prints; (17)full face photographic images and any comparable images; and (18)any other unique identifying number, characteristic, or code. (b) includes but is not limited to: information that is confidential proprietary information, trade secrets, or information technology, that is related to and important for safety and security, that is intended to assist preservation of confidentiality, privacy and/or protection from disclosure pursuant to law and/or agreement, security policies, practices and procedures, that is related to personnel compensation, evaluations and other employment/engagement/contracting information, or that is confidential proprietary information of the parties to this action or others the parties have or had relationships for purposes such as business, professional services, regulatory review/oversight, reporting, licensing, certification, approval, and/or endorsement. 2.2 Documents. As used herein, the term “document” or “documents” includes all records of any kind, manuals, policies and procedures, including, without limitation, those produced in written, recorded, photographic, electronic, e-mail, video or audio format. 2.2 Protected Health Information. “Protected Health Information” shall mean individually identifiable health information created, received, maintained, or transmitted in any medium, including, without limitation, all information, data, documentation, and materials, including without limitation, demographic, medical and financial information, that relates to the past, present, or future physical or mental health or condition of an individual; the provision of health care to an individual; or the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to an individual; and that identifies the individual or with respect to which there is a reasonable basis to believe the information can be used to identify the individual. 2.3 Electronic Health Information. “Electronic Health Information” shall mean “Protected Health Information”, as defined in Section 2.3 herein, which is transmitted by Electronic Media (as defined in the HIPAA rules) or maintained in

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whittum v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, (D. Nev. 2022).

Whittum v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada (Whittum v. University Medical Center of Southern Nevada) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)