Whitton Automotive Parts Co. v. Yale Eectric Corp.

227 A.D. 611
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1929·No. Appeal No. 1·Published

Opinion

—Order granting motion to strike out portions of amended answer affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion the charge complained of at least imported insolvency and so was libelous per se (See Hynds v. Fourteenth Street Store, 159 App. Div. 766, 775, and cases there cited); paragraphs 5 to 19, inclusive, of the amended answer, however, to stand in support of the partial defense in mitigation of damages; defendant, if so advised, to have the privilege of serving within twenty days, upon pasmen t of costs to date, a further amended answer alleging that the acts complained of were made in good faith and without malice. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitton Automotive Parts Co. v. Yale Eectric Corp., 227 A.D. 611 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

227 A.D. 611 (Whitton Automotive Parts Co. v. Yale Eectric Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hynds v. Fourteenth Street Store
159 A.D. 766 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)