Whittington v. State

727 So. 2d 282, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1151, 1999 WL 69350
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Whittington v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 2067
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 10, 1999·No. No. 97-05167·Published

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

The appellant, Andrew Whittington, challenges his judgment and sentence for trafficking in fourteen to twenty-eight grams of methamphetamine in violation of section 893.135(l)(c)l.b., Florida Statutes (1997). He contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, and that the written judgment inaccurately reflects his crime as a level eight offense. We find no merit in Whittington’s contention as to the sufficiency of the evidence and therefore affirm his conviction and sentence. We remand this cause, however, for correction of the written judgment to reflect that the offense for which Whittington was convicted is a level seven, rather than a level eight, offense.

Affirmed, but remanded for corrections.

CAMPBELL, AC.J. and BLUE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whittington v. State, 727 So. 2d 282, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1151, 1999 WL 69350 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

727 So. 2d 282 (Whittington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.